Overview of Corporate Restructuring

  • Corporate restructuring involves significant changes to a company’s legal and accounting structure.
  • These actions often attract significant press and analyst attention and are associated with increased securities trading volume.
  • Corporate changes can be grouped into three categories:
    • Investment: Increase size (e.g., acquisitions, equity investments, joint ventures).
    • Divestment: Decrease size (e.g., sales, spin-offs).
    • Restructuring: Improve cost and financing structure without altering size or scope.
  • Leveraged buyouts (LBOs) are a special case combining elements of investment, divestment, and restructuring.
  • Motivations for corporate structural change can be issuer-specific or driven by broader macroeconomic or industry changes (top-down drivers).
    • Issuer-specific motivations include realizing synergies, increasing growth, improving capabilities, acquiring undervalued targets (investment); focusing operations, valuation benefits, liquidity needs, regulatory requirements, improving returns, addressing financial challenges (divestment); and opportunistic or forced improvements to cost and balance sheets (restructuring).
    • Top-down drivers include high security prices and industry shocks, with all types of changes tending to be pro-cyclical.

Initial Evaluation of a Corporate Restructuring

  • An analyst’s initial evaluation involves answering four key questions:
    • What is happening? Identify the type of restructuring.
    • Why is it happening? Understand the issuer’s motivations.
    • Is it material? Assess the significance of the restructuring.
      • Size: Measured relative to the issuer’s enterprise value (e.g., transaction value > 10% of acquirer’s EV for acquisitions) or the scale of the intended action (e.g., cost reduction as % of revenue).
      • Fit: How the restructuring aligns with earlier actions, announced strategies, and analyst expectations.
    • When is it happening? Consider the timeline for completion, including potential delays for approvals.
  • Professional skepticism is crucial as management will typically present restructurings positively.
  • Capital market participants typically discount the expected impact (and risk of non-completion) into security prices upon announcement.

Preliminary Valuation

  • For material restructurings involving transactions, analysts conduct a preliminary valuation of the target using relative valuation methods.
  • Common methods include:
    • Comparable Company Analysis: Uses valuation multiples (e.g., EV/EBITDA, P/E, EV/Sales) of similar, publicly traded companies. More often used for spin-offs as acquisition multiples include premiums.
    • Comparable Transaction Analysis: Uses valuation multiples from historical acquisitions of similar targets, inherently including takeover premiums.
    • Premium Paid Analysis: Estimates a sale price by analyzing takeover premiums paid for comparable companies.
  • Takeover Premium Formula: PRM = (DP – SP) / SP, where DP is deal price per share and SP is unaffected stock price.
  • Analysts often use data aggregators to identify comparable companies and transactions.
  • Descriptive statistics (mean, median, range) of valuation multiples are calculated and used to estimate or evaluate a target’s value.

For more information about our CFA exam prep courses, check out our CFA Level 2 All-In-One Prep Course or the CFA Level 2 Corporate Issuers e-learning course.